国际贸易法与专利法冲突之平衡:平行进口地位确认——以“BBS案”为例重解《专利法》第69条  

The Conflict and Balance between the Patent Law and the International Trade Law

作　　者：范晓宇[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国计量学院法学院,浙江杭州310018

出　　处：《绍兴文理学院学报》2010年第6期16-20,共5页Journal of Shaoxing University

摘　　要：我国第三次专利法的修改确认了专利平行进口的合法地位。但是从国际贸易法的角度来说,不受限制的平行进口有可能抑制技术许可,破坏国内竞争环境,导致权利人利益与贸易自由的冲突。从日本法的经验以及各类知识产权的不同性质来看,采用权利用尽原则来解决各类知识产权的平行进口问题并不妥当。在解决专利平行进口问题时就不应仅仅囿于专利权国际用尽原则的讨论,而应如同日本BBS案件中所表现出来的那样,通过多种理论的综合运用以多元化的视角重新考量其解决方案。The third amendment of Patent Law establishes the legal status of parallel imports.But from the perspective of international trade,the unrestricted parallel imports may inhibit the technology licensing and destroy the domestic competitive environment,leading to the conflicts between the licensor＇s interest and the freedom of trade.From the point of view of the experience of Japanese law as well as the different nature of various types of intellectual property,it is inappropriate to deal with the problem of parallel importation of all types of intellectual property rights by employing the principle of the exhaustion of rights.The solving of the issue of parallel importation of the patent should not be solely confined to the discussion of the principle of international exhaustion of patent rights.Instead it should follow the case of BBS in Japan with a view to rethinking the solutions from diverse perspectives integrating a variety of theories.

关 键 词：平行进口 合法化 贸易自由 政策选择 BBS案 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]