检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:安东子[1] 杨艳玲[1] 李星[1] 奚璐翊[1] 李春敏[1]
机构地区:[1]北京工业大学北京市水质科学与水环境恢复工程重点试验室,北京100124
出 处:《供水技术》2010年第6期6-9,共4页Water Technology
基 金:国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2008ZX07421-0022;008ZX07422-005);国家自然科学基金资助项目(50778003);北京市自然基金资助项目(8092005)
摘 要:以人工配制的含藻原水为处理对象,比较了UF工艺、生物粉末活性炭+UF组合工艺的除藻效能。结果表明,在膜生物反应器启动阶段,生物粉末活性炭+UF组合工艺对藻类、叶绿素a、藻毒素的去除效果高于UF工艺;生物粉末活性炭形成后,组合工艺对MC-RR、MC-LR的平均去除率达到96.0%和85.2%,能去除全部的藻类和叶绿素a,是较为理想的除藻工艺。The effects of algae removal by UF membrane process,combined process of biological activated carbon powder and UF were compared with artificial prepared raw water,which some algae contained.The results showed that combined process of biological activated carbon powder and UF was better than UF membrane process for removal of algae cells,chlorophyll a,MC in start-up stage of the membrane bioreactor.The average removal rate of MC-RR and MC-LR reached 96.0% and 85.2% respectively,when the biological activated carbon powder was formed.It was able to remove all algae cells and chlorophyll a.Therefore,it was one of the appropriate processes for removal of algae.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28