法律不确定性命题——一个问题史的考察  

The Indeterminacy of Law:A Historical Inquiry

作　　者：周国兴[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院

出　　处：《环球法律评论》2010年第6期27-38,共12页Global Law Review

摘　　要：法律不确定性命题是在各流派的相互批判与辩驳的过程中不断演化和推进的。法律现实主义在对法律形式主义的反动中确立其法律不确定性命题;其理论面向上的承继者批判法律研究运动在与哈特、德沃金提供的旨在克服法律不确定性问题的两种不同方案的辩驳中论证其不确定性命题;而其经验面向上的承继者新法律现实主义则在批评批判法律研究运动理念化倾向的基础上论证其经验性研究进路。法律不确定性命题体现出来的实际上是一种"建设性的怀疑主义",是一种对现实的确定性的寻求。Under criticisms and debates among various legal schools, the thesis of indeterminacy of law has constantly evolved and developed. Legal realism has established its thesis of indeterminacy of law in the cause of counteracting legal formalism. Theoretically, the CLS, suc- cessor of legal realism, has demonstrated its thesis of indeterminacy of law through the debate over the two solutions put forward by Hart and Dworkin in order to overcome the indeterminacy of law. On the other hand, empirically, the new legal realism, also successor of legal realism, has shown its empirical approach by the affirmation that the CLS was too idealistic. What the thesis of indeterminacy of law has embodied is actually a kind of constructive skepticism. Moreover, it is aquest for determinacy of reality.

关 键 词：法律现实主义 法律不确定性 确定性 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]