检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:阎莉[1]
出 处:《科学技术哲学研究》2010年第6期48-51,共4页Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基 金:中国博士后基金面上资助(20070421001);江苏省博士后科研资助计划资助(0702027C)
摘 要:后期维特根斯坦深刻认识到任何单一的命题都不是孤立存在的,而是组成一个相互依赖的命题体系;一个命题唯有放在整个命题体系中才有认识论的意义,这一体系的整体性特征和功能构成了人类认知的基础。维特根斯坦的这种整体论思想与蒯因的整体论有诸多方面的相似,他们为共同解构传统的追求单一性、确定性和永恒性思维框架作出了贡献。但是,无论从思想取向还是从论证风格以及对知识标准的判定,二人又有较大差别。In the late year's of Wittgenstein's study,he realized that rather than in an isolation state,the propositions are formed as an interdependent system.For each proposition,only when it is within the system can it gain the epistemological meaning.There is an interdependentship among lives,and people insist on the theory that propositions form a system,of whose holistic characteristic and function structure serve as the foundation of human congnition.On this point,there is some similarity between Wittgenstein's holistic theory and Quin's,both of which contribute a great deal to break the traditional persuasion for thinking frame like oneness,definiteness and immutability.However,there is great difference when it comes to the theory orientation and demonstration style.
分 类 号:N02[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.174