检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学财政金融学院 [2]中国财政金融政策研究中心
出 处:《财贸经济》2010年第12期62-68,119,共8页Finance & Trade Economics
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“促进社会主义新农村建设的财政政策研究”(批号06JJD790033)的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:劳动力转移所带来的收入已成为农户收入的最重要来源之一并有力地促进了农户收入增长。但是本文采用中国健康与营养调查数据,通过实证分析发现农村劳动力转移对于农户教育支出存在显著的抑制作用,从而不利于农村居民长期收入增长和缩小城乡居民收入差距。进一步研究发现,在教育财政政策设计上,现阶段农村公共教育重"基础教育"轻"职业教育"和"成人教育"的财政支出结构是造成劳动力转移抑制农户教育投资的根本诱因之一。The income arising from transfer of rural labor force has increasingly become a source of household income,and potently promoted the growth of household income. However,based on an empirical investigation to test the effect of rural labor transfer on educational expenditures of households by using data from China Health and Nutrition Survey,this paper finds that rural labor transfer restrains educational expenditures of household,which is not conducive to long-term income growth of rural residents and reduce the urban-rural income gap. At present,the system of rural public education excessively values basic education while neglects Vocational Education. Furthermore,fiscal structure on education is one of the drives of the restraining effect of rural labor transfer on educational expenditures of household.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222