法院的调查取证权献疑  

Discussion on the Court's Investigation Power and Evidence Collection

作　　者：杨百胜[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072 [2]湖北大学政法与公共管理学院,湖北武汉430062

出　　处：《深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2010年第6期91-94,共4页Journal of Shenzhen University：Humanities & Social Sciences

摘　　要：我国现行有关立法于审判权之外另行赋予法院(及法官)查证权的做法是值得商榷的。文章分别从立法、司法及法理逻辑等层面,结合我国法院庭审改革的实践分析,指出这一做法既不科学,也不合理,更不能体现法治时代的精神要求。应尽速修改完善相关规定,切实体现当事人举证功能,取消法院查证权。That our current legislation gives courts（and judges） additional right to verify apart from judicial power is somewhat debatable.By investigating this issue from the levels of legislation,judiciary and legal logic,and combining the analysis of our court trial reform practice,this article points out that this practice is not scientific and reasonable and cannot reflect the spirit of the legal age.We should amend the relevant provisions so as to effectively implement the party proof function,and to abolish the court＇s investigation power and evidence collection.

关 键 词：查证权 举证责任 合理性 质疑 

分 类 号：D918[政治法律—法学]