检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙曙生[1]
机构地区:[1]南京大学法学院博士后流动站,江苏南京210004
出 处:《政法论丛》2010年第6期22-28,共7页Journal of Political Science and Law
基 金:江苏省人事厅2009年度"江苏省博士后科研资助计划"资助项目"现代性与中国法治"(0901098C)
摘 要:从《史记》到《四库全书》,法家学派的法治主义主张蒙受了众多史家的非难与谴责;近现代以来,法家的法治主义又遭受了来自西方的"实质法治主义"学说的侵袭。其实,法家的"以法治国"、"严刑峻法"等政治法律思想是中国原生态法治概念,亦是真正意义上的中国法治的本土资源。在当今多元政治思潮并立、社会经济充满激烈竞争的新战国时代及严峻的中国现实问题面前,法家的法治主义主张不失为当今中国法治建设道路的一种选择。From the "Historical Records" to "Si Ku Quan Shu",the advocates of the rule of law of Legalists school had been suffering the censure and condemnation by many historians;In modern times,Legalists' doctrine of the rule of law has been suffering the invasion of " the theory of the substance of the rule of law " from the West.This article holds Legalists' political and legal thoughts including "administer a country according to law" and "cruel torture" etc.is the Chinese concept of the rule of law in the original ecosystem,it's also China's local resources of rule of law in the true meaning.In the new period of Warring States which pluralistic politics exist side by side and socio-economic is full of fierce competition and before the tough problem of Chinese reality,Legalists advocated the rule of law and the rule of law may be one choice for the road of rule of law in today's China.
分 类 号:D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7