中国私营经济资本形成水平的空间差异性研究——基于制度非均衡的视角  

A Research on the Spatial Disparity of China’s Private Economic Capital:Based on an Institutional Non-equilibrium Approach

作　　者：姜建刚[1] 张建红[1] 

机构地区：[1]云南财经大学城市管理与资源环境学院

出　　处：《经济评论》2010年第6期113-121,共9页Economic Review

摘　　要：本文从制度非均衡角度分析中国私营经济资本形成水平及其空间差异性,并运用比较分析模型构建制度变迁的成本和收益,测算区域内和比较区域间各制度变迁的有效性系数大小。实证结果表明:中国私营经济资本形成水平及其空间差异性受产权变迁、政府对经济的干预、次要劳动市场的治理制度、信贷资金分配市场化等制度因素影响,其中产权变迁的边际影响最大;中部地区产权制度变迁对私营经济发展的有效性系数要远大于西部地区,其他制度变量的有效性系数虽均小于西部地区,但同种制度变量之间的有效性数值较接近;中、西部地区每个区域内不同制度变量的有效性系数大小不对等,其中产权变迁的有效性系数最大。本文的研究有助于深入理解制度变迁在中国经济发展中的重要作用,同时对促进中国私营经济发展有重要的参考意义。In this paper we investigate China’s private economic capital and its spatial disparity from the perspective of institutional non-equilibrium, and then we test the efficiency coefficient of the institutional change of a region and inter-regions,which is analyzed on a special cost-benefit model.The empirical results indicate that, China’s private economic capital and its spatial disparity are strongly related to the following institutional factors： property change, government’s interference on economy, interior labor market’s institution and marketization of credit capital’s distribution, among which property change plays the largest marginal effect.The efficiency of property institutional change on private economy development is much larger in middle area than in western area, while other variables display opposite results, although the efficiency values of the same variable in both areas are very close.In each area, various institutional variables have different efficiency value, and property change enjoys the largest one.Our conclusions highlight the important role of institutional change in the economic development in our country, and provide great significance to our private economy development.

关 键 词：交易成本 制度非均衡 私营经济 空间差异 有效性 

分 类 号：F121.23[经济管理—世界经济]