侵权法到底能不能独立于债法?——写在《侵权责任法》施行之后  

Can Tort Law be Independent of Debt Law after All?——Written after Law of Tort Liability has been Promulgated

作　　者：孙文桢[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉工程大学法商学院,湖北武汉430205

出　　处：《河北科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第4期48-52,57,共6页Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(09BFX025)

摘　　要：在《侵权责任法》施行之后研究侵权法能否独立于债法,这对于目前正在进行的民法法典化有着重要意义。从侵权概念的定义来看,侵权可两分为侵权行为和侵权事件;从侵权现象的法制史来看,侵权的产生早于债的产生;从民法规范的逻辑结构来看,民法规范只包括"假定"和"处理"两部分,而保护性法律关系和调整性法律关系均属于"处理"。因此,侵权法不能独立于债法。It＇s important to study whether tort law can be independent of debt law after Law of Tort Liability has been promulgated,considering the codification of civil law is being conducted.Tort can be divided into two kinds： tort behavior and tort incident from the perspective of the definition of tort conception.Tort came into being before debt from the view point of legal history,from the perspective of logical structure of civil law standard,which consists of ＂presumption＂ and ＂treatment＂.protective legal relation and adjusting legal relation Both belong to the ＂treatment＂ part of a civil law norm.As a result,tort law cannot be independent of debt law.

关 键 词：侵权法 《侵权责任法》 债法 侵权的两分法 私犯 逻辑结构 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]