检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王黎静[1] 郭奋飞[1] 何雪丽[1] 向维[1]
机构地区:[1]北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院,北京100191
出 处:《北京航空航天大学学报》2010年第11期1266-1270,共5页Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
基 金:国家973基金资助项目(2010CB734103)
摘 要:机组对飞机的成功操作很大程度上依赖于一套精心编制的飞行员操作程序,不合理或不合逻辑的操作程序可能导致飞行员的违规操作,进而引发飞行事故.参考波音737NG飞行机组操作手册,分析进近和着陆阶段的任务功能流程后确定了评价指标体系的层次结构;采用德尔菲法对现役飞行员进行两轮咨询,建立了基于安全性的进近和着陆阶段飞行员操作程序综合评价指标体系;对飞行员进行咨询,采用序关系分析法确定了各指标的权重系数;应用模糊综合评价法对飞行员操作程序进行综合评价,得到了飞行员操作程序的评价等级和评价值.提出了一种将功能流程图法、德尔菲法、序关系分析法和模糊综合评价法相结合的飞行员操作程序综合评价方法,并应用于波音737NG飞机进近和着陆阶段的操作程序评价.评价结果说明了该综合评价方法的合理性.Mostly by an elaborate set of pilot operation procedures(POP) crew can control planes successfully.Pilot may operate wrong under the inconsistent or illogical procedures,which can cause accident in flight.Normal procedures of approach and landing phases which come from flight crew operations manual of the Boeing 737NG airplane were divided into task function flow,then the hierarchy of index system was confirmed.The comprehensive evaluation index system of POP in approach and landing phases was established by consulting in-service pilots with Delphi method twice.Index weight factors were calculated by order relation analysis.POP was evaluated by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and evaluation scales and values were calculated by weight factors and evaluation matrixes.A POP comprehensive evaluation method was proposed with the integration of functional flow diagram,Delphi,order relation analysis and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.The method was used in evaluation of Boeing 737NG airplane POP of approach and landing phases.The result indicate the validity and rationality of the comprehensive evaluation method.
关 键 词:飞行员操作程序 进近和着陆 评价指标 权重系数 模糊综合评价
分 类 号:R857.11[医药卫生—航空、航天与航海医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222