检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄琴红[1] 曹燕[1] 朱萍[1] 朱雪芬[1] 蔡亚萍[1] 朱俊霞[1]
出 处:《中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志》2010年第12期1144-1146,共3页China Journal of Emergency Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨ICU标准化护理床旁交接班考评系统临床应用。方法采用ICU实施标准化护理床旁交接班考评系统,分别收集传统的床旁交接班模式(观察组)与标准化床旁交接班模式(实验组)下护理质量考评结果,并进行对比分析。结果观察组记录286次(286个床单元),交接班质量不符合规范要求253项,存在241项护理安全隐患。实验组记录288次(288个床单元),交接班质量不符合规范要求84项,存在安全隐患18项,两组对照比较,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论ICU护士实施标准化护理床旁交接班考评系统明显提高了床旁交接班的质量,减少了护理安全隐患。Objective To explore its clinical application effects of the standardized nursing bedside shift relief appraisal system at ICU. Methods An assessment was conducted on records collected from two groups - control group (normal shift procedure) and experiment group (standardized nursing bedside shift relief appraisal). Results In 286 records obtained from control group, 253 items were found unqualified while 84 items were found in 288 records of experiment group. There was a significant difference between two groups (P〈0.05). Conclusion The standardized nursing bedside-Shift appraisal system in ICU helps a great deal to improve qualifies of the service.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147