检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南财经大学,四川成都610074 [2]中共云南省委党校,云南昆明650111
出 处:《保险研究》2010年第12期108-114,共7页Insurance Studies
摘 要:中国保险业正以日新月异的速度向前发展,然而保险合同纠纷数量的不断攀升却成了阻碍其前进的绊脚石。保险合同纠纷的诉讼解决机制应用广泛,但其自身的弊端却使部分当事人望而却步。建立多元化的保险合同纠纷解决机制,满足当事人不同层面的纠纷解决需求成为支持保险业持续发展的重要课题。本文探讨了保险合同纠纷不同解决机制的利弊及在我国的发展现状,并试图为我国建立多元化的保险合同纠纷解决机制提出几点建议。China's insurance industry has been developing rapidly. However, the increasing number of insurance contract disputes has become an obstacle for its further development. Litigation is widely used in insurance contract dispute settlement, but its inherent drawbacks have discouraged many people. It becomes important to establish a diversified dispute settlement mechanism to meet needs of different parties and to support sustainable development of the insurance industry. This article discussed the advantages and disadvantages of multiple settlements for insurance disputes and the current situation in our country, and tried to offer some advice on the establishment of the diversified dispute settlement mechanism for insurance contract disputes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.136.20.207