检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴贺文[1] 叶培军[1] 黄静[1] 冯艳平[1]
出 处:《中国医药》2011年第1期89-91,共3页China Medicine
摘 要:目的 探讨小剂量普通肝素对脓毒症的治疗作用.方法 将2007年10月至2009年12月入住我院ICU的85例脓毒症患者分为普通肝素治疗组45例和对照组40例.对照组给予早期应用广谱抗生素和容量复苏、控制血糖、抑酸保护胃黏膜、纠正水、电解质和酸碱平衡紊乱、脏器支持、基础病因治疗、营养支持及对症治疗.普通肝素治疗组在进行上述治疗的同时加用普通肝素5 U/(kg·h),24 h持续静脉泵入,疗程为1周(或用至患者出现低凝状态或出血倾向,或用至患者出院或死亡).比较2组患者治疗前后APACHEⅡ评分、CRP、凝血指标及血小板计数的变化;比较2组7 d及28 d转归及2组出血并发症发生率.结果 普通肝素治疗组28 d生存率为82.22%(37/45),对照组为62.50%(25/40),2组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).治疗后1周APACHEⅡ评分2组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但可以看出普通肝素治疗组的评分较对照组改善更大;普通肝素治疗组治疗前后比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后1周2组CRP差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但2组治疗前后组内比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01或P<0.05).2组治疗前后凝血功能的指标及血小板计数均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与对照组相比普通肝素治疗组未增加出血并发症的发生率.结论 小剂量普通肝素治疗能显著改善脓毒症患者的生存率,且无严重并发症,临床应用安全.Objective To explore the therapeutic effects of low-dose unfractionated heparin(UFH) therapy on sepsis. Methods Eighty-five sepsis patients were divided into two groups: heparin treatment group ( n = 45 )and routine treatment group (control group) (n =40). The patients of control group received a series of remedies,including broad-spectrum antibiotics in early stage, supplementing of circulation volume, protecting of mucosal membrane of stomach, correcting the water, electrolyte and acid-base disturbance, and nutrition and supportive therapy. The patients of UFH treatment group were treated with UFH 5 U/( kg · h) by continuous intravenous infusion for 7 days in addition to routine treatment. The difference of APACHE-Ⅱ score, CRP, coagulation markers and platelet count between two groups were analyzed before and after treatment. The hemorrhage complication and survival rate in 7 days and 28 days were compared between the two groups. Results The survival rate was 82.22% and 62.50% in UFH treatment group and control group respectively (P 〈 0.05). There was no significant difference of coagulation markers and PLT count between the two groups before and after treatment (P 〉 0. 05). The incidence of hemorrhage complication was not higher in UFH treatment group compared with that of control group (P 〉 0.05 ).Conclusion UFH therapy can improve the survival rate of patients with sepsis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117