文与道争鸣中宋代之文学宋玉批评与理学宋玉批评  

Criticism to Song Yu in the Contention of Prose Masters and Idealists in the Song Dynasty

作　　者：刘刚[1] 

机构地区：[1]鞍山师范学院中文系,辽宁鞍山114007

出　　处：《辽东学院学报（社会科学版）》2011年第1期91-101,共11页Journal of Liaodong University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：宋代的宋玉批评,是在文与道争鸣的文化背景中进行的。当时,人们为了阐述自己的文道观,常常以屈原及其后学宋玉为例论证各自的主张,于是他们有关宋玉的批评就在文与道的争鸣中展开了。考察宋代的宋玉批评,绝大多数批评家对于战国末年的辞赋家宋玉与其作品给予了充分的肯定,只有极少数理学家持否定态度。这有力地说明,肯定宋玉的文学史地位,肯定宋玉作品的讽谏内容和创作艺术,不仅是宋代宋玉批评的主流,而且有着超大比例的强势。Criticism to Song Yu in the Song Dynasty was carried out in the cultural background of contention between prose masters and idealists. At that time, in order to state the outlook on literature and Taoism, people often demonstrated their ideas by taking Qu Yuan and Song Yu as examples, thus launching the criticism to Song Yu. Most people fully affirmed Song Yu who was a master of Fu in late the Warring States and his works, only extremely few idealists stood in a negative position. This shows that affirming the position of Song Yu in the literary history and the satire content and writing art in his works is the mainstream with great advantages in the criticism to Song Yu in the Song Dynasty.

关 键 词：宋玉批评 宋代 文道争鸣 批评主流 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]