要物合同立场的比较法考察及其启示——以我国的不同法域为考察对象  

The Comparative Study of the Attitudes of the Scholars to the Real Contract in the Four Legal Units in China and Its Inspiration

作　　者：蒋军洲[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南工业大学法学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《河北法学》2011年第2期97-106,共10页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：蒋军洲主持的河南工业大学高层次人才科研启动基金项目<合意主义体系下的要物合同制度研究>(2009BS024)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：要物合同是自古罗马法以来被保留至今的法律遗产。关于在我国民法典中其存废问题,学者们多从要物合同与合意主义存在冲突出发,主张将它废除。但在系统地了解要物合同制度之前,急匆匆地决定其去留是欠妥当的。我国有四个法域。这四个法域有的属于英美法系,有的属于大陆法系。即使有的法域同属大陆法系,它们也可能分属拉丁法族或德国法族。如此不同的法律传统为我们深入了解要物合同的相关知识提供了可能。展开这四个法域的要物合同比较法考察有助于厘清现今的要物合同讨论应关注哪些重点内容,相关的深入研究应采取哪种适当方法。Real contract is the legal heritage which has been resevered for a long time as of the Roman law. About the reservation or abolishment of such contract, many scholars argue that it should be abolished because the contract is conflicted with the consensualism. But it is considerableless to hurrily decide the reservation or abolishment of real contract before having a systematical recognition of such contract. There are four legal units in China and some of them belong to English law, some of them belong to Conteniental law. Even though all of them belong to Conteniental law, it is possible that each of them belongs to Latin law system or German law system. The legal tradtion is so different that it could provide an opportunity to deeply find the concerned konowlege of real contract. It is helpful that we develop the comparative study of the real contract in the four legal units to clear the mainpoints of the study of real contract and the proper research methods.

关 键 词：要物合同 要物合同简约 要物合同预约 比较法 法域 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]