转型时期司法中的民意现状与策略设计  

Status and New Strategy of Public Opinion in China's Transition Judicature

作　　者：孙日华[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《太平洋学报》2010年第12期19-28,共10页Pacific Journal

基　　金：山东省社会科学规划研究项目(09CFXZ20)阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：中国转型时期,法官对司法中的民意采取了比较模糊的回应手法,缺乏对民意精细化和程序化的分析与运用,导致了司法公信力的缺失。因此,法官需要对民意进行灵活的识别,有针对性地回应。民意的回应策略需要坚持论辩主义精神,建立在程序主义基础之上。对法律方面的民意须保持警惕,并充分地解释;运用事实方面的民意还原事实真相,节约司法成本;思考结论性民意背后的推理逻辑,但不直接采纳结论性的意见;将制度建设的民意作为日后司法改革的参考资料。建立科学合理的媒体交流平台,需要媒体在民意与司法之间保持客观公正的立场与姿态,避免媒体的不当报道加剧司法与民意的矛盾。改善司法的运作模式和法官选任机制,降低日后回应民意的司法成本。In China＇s transition period,the judges response to public opinion in the jurisdictional process in an ambiguous way,it lacks analysis and manipulation of the refinement and procedures of public opinion,thus resulting in the lack of judicial credibility.Therefore,the judges are required to flexibly identify public opinion,and make targeted response.Public opinion＇s response strategies need to adhere to polemic spirit,based on procedure-regulatedness.Be vigilant of the public opinion on the legal aspects,and make full explanation;use the public opinion about fact to restore the truth and save the cost of justice;think of the reasoning logic behind the conclusive public opinion,but do not adopt directly the concluding observations;make public opinion as a future reference for the reforming of the administration of justice.Improve the mode of justice operation and the judges＇ selection mechanism to reduce the cost of justice.

关 键 词：转型时期 民意 识别 回应 

分 类 号：D916[政治法律—法学]