检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学附属第四医院护理部,黑龙江哈尔滨150001
出 处:《中华医院感染学杂志》2011年第1期89-90,共2页Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
基 金:黑龙江省教育厅资助(11513057)
摘 要:目的为医务人员寻找高效的洗手消毒方法,制定改进措施。方法全院在班医务人员300名随机分3组进行监测,试验1组:0.2%过氧乙酸液毛巾擦洗手,试验2组:百能牌消毒剂;对照组:肥皂流动水洗手。结果 3组除菌率依次为97.5%、94.3%、76.3%,过氧乙酸组及百能牌消毒剂组与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义。结论 0.2%过氧乙酸与百能牌消毒剂可达到良好消毒效果,但百能牌消毒剂使用较简单方便。OBJECTIVE To explore which method for sterilizing hands is more effective, convenient and without stimulation for medical personnel. METHODS A total of 300 nurses on duty were divided into three groups randomly. In the test group, of 0. 2% peracetie and acid, Baineng disinfectant fluid were used, In the control group only soap with flowing water was used for hands sterilization. RESULTS The rates of bacterial removal were 97.5% ,94.3% and 76.3% ,respectively. The efficacy of Baineng disinfectant fluid was similar to 0.2% peracetic acid. Both of them were significantly different from others. CONCLUSION 0. 2% peraeetie acid and Baineng disinfectant fluid can achieve a good disinfection effect, and Baineng disinfectant fluid is simple and convenient for use.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.6.159