检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《建筑科学》2011年第1期85-87,92,共4页Building Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(50908048);江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK2008315)
摘 要:采用自平衡测试法对澜沧江特大桥二根人工挖孔嵌岩桩进行了静载荷试验,并采用钢筋计测试元件进行了桩身轴向应力测试,得到了桩极限承载力、桩端阻力以及桩侧摩阻力。综合分析了国内规范中嵌岩桩极限承载力理论计算的优缺点,将试桩极限承载力测试结果与现行规范极限承载力计算值进行了比较研究。研究表明规范计算结果均小于实测值,部分不计嵌岩段侧摩阻力的规范计算值过于保守。To obtain the bearing characteristics of man-excavated rock-socketed piles of Lancang River Bridge,by using the Osterberg method the axial stress tests along the shaft were conducted for two single piles based on strain gauges embedded in piles.Bearing capacity,side friction,tip resistance and load bearing properties of the piles were gained.The advantages and disadvantages of the calculation method for the ultimate bearing capacity of the rock-socketed piles in domestic standards were analyzed in detail,and a comparative study on the ultimate bearing capacity of the field measured values and the calculated values was made.The results indicate that the calculated values of the domestic standards are smaller than the field measured values,and some calculated values of the domestic standards without calculating the side friction of rock-socketed section are over-conservative.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158