试论民事诉讼中的证据排除规则  

On the Exclusionary Rule of Evidence in Civil Procedure

作　　者：赵雅琴[1] 袁鹰[2] 

机构地区：[1]山西大学法学院,山西太原030006 [2]山西广播电视大学,山西太原030027

出　　处：《山西广播电视大学学报》2011年第2期75-77,共3页Journal of Shanxi Radio & TV University

摘　　要：证据排除规则最早起源于英美国家,是现代证据制度中的重要规则,是法官用以判断证据是否具有证据能力的重要依据。由于立法模式、诉讼模式以及法文化的差异,英美法系和大陆法系的民事诉讼中的证据排除规则存在较大的差异。分析证据排除规则的历史渊源和两大法系排除规则的内容及其差异,可促进借鉴西方经验完善我国的民事诉讼中的证据排除规则。Exclusionary rule of evidence, firstly originated from Britain and the USA, is an important rule in the modern evidence system, and is an important basis for the judge to determine whether the evidence has the convincing of evidence. Because of the legislative model, litigation model and methods of cultural differences, there is a big difference in exclusionary rule of evidence between the civil procedure of Anglo - American law system and the continental law system. This paper analyzes the historical origin of exclusionary rule, the contents of the two law systems and their differences, which can help to perfect the exclusionary rule of evidence in our civil procedure by learning from Western experience.

关 键 词：证据排除规则 英美法系 大陆法系 

分 类 号：G640[文化科学—高等教育学]