地下水质量综合评价方法优选与分析——以滹沱河冲洪积扇为例  

Optimal selection and analysis of groundwater quality evaluation methods:A case study in the Hutuo River alluvial pluvial fan

作　　者：李亚松[1] 张兆吉[1] 费宇红[1] 钱永[1] 王昭[1] 陈京生[1] 张凤娥[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国地质科学院水文地质环境地质研究所,石家庄050061

出　　处：《水文地质工程地质》2011年第1期6-10,共5页Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology

基　　金：国家重点基础研究发展计划("973"计划)项目(2010CB428801-1;2010CB428804-1);国土资源大调查项目(1212010634600)

摘　　要：地下水质量评价方法是决定地下水质量评价工作的关键环节。以滹沱河冲洪积扇为研究区,通过对比内梅罗指数法和模糊数学综合评价法,得出参评指标中痕量指标较多时,内梅罗指数法评价结果受极值影响较大,并且未考虑参评指标权重及评价结果的物理意义难以界定,不适用于综合指标评价;模糊数学综合评价法的相乘相加算子考虑了所有参评指标的权重,并以隶属状况判定评价等级,评价方法较为合理,但是当单项毒理指标超标但浓度较低时评价结果失真,经修正后失真情况得以消除,评价结果也较为客观。Taking the Hutuo River alluvial pluvial fan for example,in contrast to the fuzzy mathematics method,the Nemerow method is significantly affected by extreme values while trace indexes are of higher proportion.Since the weights of evaluation indexes are neglected,the physical meaning of evaluation results is hard to define.So we can conclude that the Nemerow method is not suitable for evaluation of multiple indexes.As the weights of the indexes＇are considered and membership degree is used to define evaluation results,together with high efficient utilization of information,the method of multiplication and summation operator of fuzzy mathematics method is more reasonable.However,the evaluation results are distorted when the level of single toxicological index is impermissibly high,and this phenomenon will disappeared as combined with index number method.The integrated method is much more appropriate for multiple indexes evaluation.

关 键 词：地下水质量评价 综合指标 内梅罗 模糊数学 

分 类 号：X824[环境科学与工程—环境工程]