检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭道玉[1,2] 龙云淑[3] 向伟[1,2] 邹清[1,2]
机构地区:[1]泸州医学院护理学院 [2]泸州医学院卫生学校,四川泸州646000 [3]四川省宜宾市第一人民医院,644000
出 处:《检验医学与临床》2011年第2期137-139,共3页Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
基 金:中国高等教育学会"十一五"教育科学规划课题(06AIJ0770024)
摘 要:目的通过两种测试方法检验人际沟通能力测评量表的有效性和可行性。方法运用人际沟通能力测评量表对46名护理专业五年制高职女学生分别采用实践观察法(短期)和语言测试法进行人际沟通能力测试,采用克朗巴哈系数和因子分析法进行信度和效度检验。结果对人际沟通能力测评量表中语言表达能力、语言交流能力、亲和力、沟通技巧、应变能力5类指标进行克朗巴哈一致性系数检测,实践观察法和语言测试法信度分别为0.883和0.930。采用因子分析法对5类指标的15个指标内涵项目得分进行主成分分析,取特征值大于1的3个因子为公因子,累计贡献率两种方法均为70.78%,通过正交旋转获得正交旋转因子矩阵,两种方法中除1~2项外,其余项目被公因子提取的信息均大于50%。结论两种测试方法对护理专业五年制高职女生人际沟通能力进行测评的信度、效度良好,而语言测试法优于实践观察法(短期)。Objective To investigate the validity of two assessment methods to evaluate communicate ability in nursing students.Methods The interpersonal communication ability evaluation meter was used to carry out the interpersonal communication ability test with the practical observation method and the language test method separately in 46 female nursing students.Cronbach coefficient and the factor analytic method were used to conduct the reliability analysis and the validity examination.Results 5 indexes including language competence,language exchange ability,affinity,communication skill and strain capacity in the interpersonal communication ability evaluation meter were performed the Cronbach uniform coefficient examination.The reliability coefficients of the practical observation method and the language test method were 0.883 and 0.930 respectively.The main ingredient analysis was carried on 15 target connotation scores of 5 project,4 factors with the characteristic value bigger than 1 as the common factor,the accumulation contribution rate by two methods was 70.78%,the orthogonal factor matrix was obtained through orthogonal rotation,the information of the project by the common factor extraction 50%.Conclusion Two assessment techniques for evaluating the communicate ability in female nursing students have good reliability and good validity.But the language test method is superior to practical observation method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145