检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中山大学岭南学院 [2]中国人民银行广州分行
出 处:《学术研究》2011年第1期81-90,159,共10页Academic Research
基 金:作者主持的全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金资助项目(200504);教育部新世纪优秀人才计划(2007);中央高校基本业务经费(2009)的资助
摘 要:我国股票市场"政策市"现象由来已久,但一直缺乏规范的解释。"政策市"实质上是相关制度和政策变动引致的市场系统风险的体现,根本上取决于制度改革和政策制定的方式本身。我们将"摸着石头过河"式的制度改革和政策制定方式,描述为代理变量的随机过程,建立了其马尔可夫过程假说;再根据假说构造了股票定价和市盈率决定的随机Gordon模型,推导出我国股市强振荡性的几个命题。研究表明,"摸着石头过河"的政策方式必然引起"政策市",不利于发挥资本市场的基本功能;应逐步采用连贯和平稳的制度改革和政策制定方式,以消除系统性的政策不确定性造成的预期变动和股市的强烈振荡。Chinese stock market has been exhibiting a feature of policy market for a long time, but which lacks a normative explanation. The authors argue that the phenomenon is essentially an outcome of systematical risks induced by relevant institutional and policy changes, caused fundamentally from the paradigm of institutional reformation and policy making. By conforming to the paradigm of‘cross the river by feeling its stones’, we model the evolution of institution or policy as a stochastic process and establish its Markov-process hypothesis. We set up accordingly a stochastic Gordon model and derive a formula for stock price and price-earning ratio to investigate market volatility issues. Several propositions are put forward and it is concluded that the paradigm of ‘cross the river by feeling its stones’may definitely incurs policy market, which depresses the functions of capital market, and that more consistent and stable paradigm of policy making are urgent, so as to smooth the expectation change and market volatility resulted from systematical policy uncertainty.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15