欧盟距离“同一个欧洲”还有多远?——德国联邦宪法法院里斯本条约案判决的法律分析  

How Far is the European Union from One Europe Dream?——A Jurisprudential Analysis of the Judgment of Lisbon Treaty Case by German Federal Constitutional Court

作　　者：高仰光[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《中国人民大学学报》2011年第1期117-125,共9页Journal of Renmin University of China

摘　　要：2009年,德国联邦宪法法院就里斯本条约的合(宪)法性所做的判决引起了一场争论,争论的焦点在于欧洲一体化的主导权究竟应当由成员国掌握还是由欧盟掌握。判决的支持者认为,该判决有力地保障了成员国本应享有的主导权,联邦宪法法院的审查权仍将一如既往地防止德国在与欧盟的关系中陷于被动地位;判决的反对者则认为,里斯本条约的意义在于使欧盟获得主导权,但是该判决为了狭隘的国家利益违背了这一精神,因此必将阻碍欧洲一体化的进程。孰是孰非?后里斯本时代的欧盟究竟距离"同一个欧洲"的梦想还有多远?我们可以通过梳理里斯本条约案中的法律逻辑来解读这个问题。The judgment,which German Federal Constitutional Court made in 2009,upheld the compatibality of the Treaty of Lisbon with the German Constitution.Supporters argued that the decision effectively protected the initiative of the member states because the right of constitutional review of constitutional courts could prevent the European Union from invading the member states＇ sovereignty.Opponents argued that the decision was definitely contrary to the spirit to the Treaty of Lisbon for the sake of narrow national interests.Therefore,the judgment would hinder the unfinished process of European integration.Who was right？ How far is the European Union from One Europe Dream？ This article tries to render an answer through a jurisprudential analysis of the judgment.

关 键 词：里斯本条约 民主原则 主权国家原则 联邦议院参与权 

分 类 号：D95[政治法律—法学] D911