我国两审终审制度的考量——以国外审级制度比较为视角  

Considerations on China Two-Tier Appellate System——Taking the Foreign Trial Grade System as the Visual Angle of Comparison

作　　者：姚绍芬[1] 

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学法学院,福建福州350007

出　　处：《西安石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第1期63-67,共5页Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：审级制度是审判制度的重要组成部分,同时也是诉讼中的一项重要制度。近年来,不少学者对两审终审制度提出质疑,认为我国现行的两审终审制度已不适应现实审判的要求,存在种种弊端,应予以改革,主张改现行的两审终审制为三审终审制。然而通过对国外审级制度的比较及成因的分析可知,一国的审级制度应该与本国的国情相适应。同时对学者所提出的两审终审制的弊端,实质是整个司法体制的问题,而非审级制度的问题,而且实行三审终审制也不具有可行性。我国的两审终审制的存续有其合理性,应加以坚持而不应废除。The trial grade system is one significant part of trial system, and is also an important lawsuit system. In recent years, a number of scholars questioned the two - tier appellate system, considering that the current two - tier appellate system in our country cannot meet the needs of real trial and have some drawbacks. So they insist that the current trial grade system should be transformed into three -tier appellate system. How- ever, by the contrast with foreign trial grade systems and the analysis of their forming causes, it is known that one country~ trial grade system should be compatible with its national condition. Meanwhile, it is also presented that drawbacks mentioned by scholars are actually the issues of the whole judicial system, but not the problems of the trial grade system. Besides, it is not feasible to conduct three - tier appellate system in China. In short, the existence of our two - tier appellate system has its own rationality, so it is necessary to maintain it instead of abandoning it.

关 键 词：审级制度 两审终审 三审终审 

分 类 号：D921.14[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]