检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《西安石油大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年第1期68-71,103,共5页Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition
基 金:江苏省社科基金项目(08FXB004)
摘 要:我国现行的职业安全与职业卫生立法总体上呈分立状态,导致实践中出现人为地增加执法与守法成本、职能交叉与职能缺位,进一步加重了重安全、轻职业病防治等消极现象。实际上在我国职业安全与职业卫生的一体化立法不但是必要的,而且是可行的,可以从制定统一的《职业安全卫生法》、设立统一的监管机构、培养专业的执法监管人员等角度着手一体化工作。Our current legislation of occupational safety and health is in a state of separation on the whole, which results in many negative phenomena: the man -made increase of law enforcement and law abiding costs, the overlap and absence of functions, the over - emphasis on occupational safety and the ignorance of occupational disease prevention. In fact, it is not only necessary, but also feasible to integrate occupational safety and health in legislation in our country. This integration can be carried out from different perspectives like establishing the unified "Law of Occupational Safety and Health", setting up the unified supervisory organization, fostering the professional officials of law enforcement and supervision.
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222