自我主体的归来与流放——20世纪80年代文学的疯癫话语谱系与文化隐喻  

The Return and Exile of Self-object——Pedigree and cultural metaphor of Lunacy discourse in the Chinese literature of 1980s

作　　者：刘传霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]济南大学文学院,济南250022

出　　处：《晋阳学刊》2011年第1期129-134,共6页Academic Journal of Jinyang

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目"中国当代文学身体政治研究"(批准号:09YJA751036);山东省社科基金项目"身体叙事与自我认同"(批准号:08CWXJ16)的研究成果之一

摘　　要：疯癫不是一般医学意义上的疾病,也不是一个永恒不变的实在,而是一种历史话语建构。作为一种文化隐喻和意义符号,在中国社会政治经济文化又一次经历巨大转换的20世纪80年代,它再次获得了出场机会和言说权力,成为当代中国知识分子书写自我和社会的文化符码。它的出场及其话语变迁,与中国知识分子对做为个体的自我在巨大社会权力网络中的地位认知和认同紧密相关,与中国社会现代性进程的推进有关。从某种意义上来看,20世纪80年代文学中的疯癫话语史,就是当代中国知识分子的精神史。Lunacy is a historical discourse, which is not a generally medical disease, nor an immutable existence. Chinese society had experienced dramatic transformation in the 1980s. As a cultural metaphor and symbol, it once a gain won the chance to appear on the scene and had power to speak. Lunacy becomes a cultural code for Chinese con- temporary intellectuals to write self and society. Its appearing in the 1980s Chinese literature was closely related to the Chinese intellectuals cognitive or identity as individual self in great social power network and the Chinese community in advancing the process of modernity. In a sense, literary history of lunacy discourse in the 1980s was the spiritual history of modern Chinese intellectuals.

关 键 词：疯癫 自我主体 知识分子 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]