两种中心静脉压监测法及导管并发症的比较分析  

An Analysis Of Central-Venous-Catheter-Related Complications Among Two Monitoring Methods Of Central Venous Pressure

作　　者：俞娜[1] 汪梅朵[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽医科大学附属省立医院,合肥230001

出　　处：《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》2010年第6期68-69,共2页Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College

摘　　要：目的:分析压力传感器和传统手工标尺测量法监测体外循环术后患者中心静脉压及其导管相关性并发症的发生情况,为压力传感器测压法在临床的推广使用提供理论依据。方法:采用单纯随机抽样法,对某医院心脏外科187例行体外循环术的先天性及后天性心脏病患者,分为:实验组术后采用压力传感器,对照组采用传统标尺手工法测量中心静脉压,观察记录两组患者导管相关性并发症发生情况。结果:实验组患者机械性和感染性导管相关性并发症发生率显著低于对照组,差别有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:压力传感器能准确监测体外循环术后患者中心静脉压的动态变化,且使用方便,导管相关性并发症发生率相对较小。Objectives： analysis the central-venous-catheter-related complications among pressure pickup monitor method and triditional ruler method,supply the theoretical evidence for using the pressure pickup monitor method in clinical nursing.Methods： the pressure pickup monitor method and the traditional ruler method were used among the experimental group and matched group respevtively by random sampling method among 187 apriority and posteriority cardiopathy patients after operation,the central-venous-catheter-related complications among them were observed and recorded.Results： the central-venous-catheter-related complications among the experimental group was lower than the matched group in statistics（P0.05）.Conclusion： the pressure pickup monitor method survey the central venous pressure among cardiopathy patients accurately and conveniently,and the incidence rate of central-venous-catheter-related complication was lower.

关 键 词：体外循环 中心静脉压 护理 

分 类 号：R472.9[医药卫生—护理学]