检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘小勇[1]
机构地区:[1]汕头大学法学院
出 处:《环球法律评论》2011年第1期60-70,共11页Global Law Review
摘 要:公司的公益性捐赠值得鼓励与支持,但因实施过度的捐赠而给公司利益造成损失的董事应承担责任。通过考察美国、日本的判例及学说得知,由于捐赠并非经营性行为,适用于判断违反忠实义务的公正标准与判断违反注意义务的经营判断原则并不适合于审查捐赠行为,而是要适用合理性标准。而合理性标准包括金额的合理与目的的合理。判断金额的合理,除应考虑公司的利润、资产等经济状况外,还应结合捐赠的目的进行综合判断。Corporate donation deserves encouragement and support. Nevertheless, directors shall assume responsibility for corporate loss caused by excessive donation. Through study of eases and doctrines in USA and Japan, fairness test used to judge breach of loyalty duty and business judgment rule used to judge breach of duty of care are not suited to the examination of acts of donation, since donation is not regarded as business operation. Reasonableness standard, therefore, is applied in examining corporate donation. Reasonableness standard includes reasonableness in amount and reasonableness in purpose. To judge reasonableness in amount, we should consider not only economic conditions such as corporate profit and assets, but also the purpose of donation comprehensively. For purpose related to business of corporate, discretion of directors shall be respected. However, for purpose irrelevant to business of corporate, donation should be strictly reviewed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7