检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学物理学院核物理与核技术国家重点实验室,北京100871
出 处:《辐射防护》2011年第1期13-16,22,共5页Radiation Protection
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(11075009)
摘 要:密闭腔体法(closed chamber method)是目前建材氡析出率测量中使用较为广泛的一种方法。使用密闭腔体法测量建材氡析出率,在建材的前处理上,大体上将长方体建材分为完全裸露、包裹留下一面和留下两面三种方法进行测量。本文从建材氡析出率测量的基本理论模型出发,细致比较分析了不同包裹方法测量得到的氡析出率的真实涵义,并结合理论分析和实验验证,提出了合理的修正方法,认为包裹留一面和留两面适合作为建材氡析出率的测量方法。Closed Chamber Methods have been widely used to measure radon exhalation rate from building material.It is found,however,that different sealing methods of treatments on building materials before measurements were used in different laboratories worldwide.Taking a brick as an example,as treatment on building materials,sealing up 4 sides,5 sides or totally baring were reported.To understand and confirm the differences between different treatments on building materials,theoretical analysis were carried out on basis of the definition and measuring model of radon exhalation rate from building materials in this study.The real meaning and the matter of each different sealing method were analyzed in detail,and experimental study was also performed.In summary,the two methods of sealing up 4 sides and sealing up 5 sides were regarded as appropriate methods to measuring exhalation rate but reasonable correction was necessary.
分 类 号:X837[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30