检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国林业科学研究院资源昆虫研究所,昆明650216
出 处:《生态学报》1999年第5期732-736,共5页Acta Ecologica Sinica
基 金:云南省应用基础基金
摘 要:选择有代表性的10个白蜡主产地,研究了各地白蜡虫天敌群落的物种组成和群落结构,并进行了聚类分析和排序。结果表明,白蜡虫泌蜡期天敌群落共有捕食和寄生性天敌18种,各群落的优势种和物种组成变化较小,群落相似性程度较高,相似性系数最高达95.12%,最低为73.86%。影响群落相似性的主要因子为产区、地理位置、捕食性瓢虫的种类和数量。每一群落有3~4种优势种天敌,导致白蜡虫天敌群落的优势度集中指数较低,多样性指数和均匀性指数较高。通过聚类分析和排序,将白蜡虫天敌群落分为3类:第1类为种虫产地;第2类为白蜡产地;第3类虫蜡皆产。3种类型的寄生性天敌优势种种类相同,但数量变化较大。捕食性天敌的种类和危害有很大区别。The natural enemy communities of white wax insects were investigated in 10 main production areas in the period of secreting white wax.The results showed that there were 18 species of natural enemies in the communities.The highest coefficient of community similarity was 95.12%,and the lowest coefficient was 73.86%.The main factors interfering with community similarity were producing area,geographical region,species and quantites of predacious ladybirds.There were 3~4 dominant species of natural enemies in one community,so the community aggregation indices were relatively low,and their diversity indices and evenness indices high.The communities can be divided into three groups by systematic clustering analysis and two dimensional ordination:①producing area of seed insect;②producing area of white wax:③producing area of seed insect and white wax.The dominant species of parasitic natural enemies were Microterys ericeri,Metaphycus ericeri,Tetrastichus kodaikanalensis in all the three groups.The dominant species of predatory natural enemy was Chilocorus rubidus in group 2 and C.bijugus in group 3.There was not the dominant species of predatory natural enemy in group 1.
分 类 号:S769[农业科学—森林保护学] S899.1[农业科学—林学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40