奥林匹克标志侵权法律规制的比较研究  

Comparative Study of the Infringement Legislation of the Olympic Symbols

作　　者：黄世昌[1] 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学体育部,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《天津体育学院学报》2011年第1期58-61,79,共5页Journal of Tianjin University of Sport

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(项目编号:06BTY013);国家法制与法学理论研究立项课题(项目编号:07SFB3002)

摘　　要：奥林匹克标志作为人类文明的精神符号,具有不可侵犯和亵渎的意义。但在当代商品经济意识不断膨胀的作用下,最为神圣的精神成果也受到了侵扰和腐蚀。如何以立法形式保护人类文明的精神成果已引起世界各国的高度重视。从借鉴美、澳、英3国奥林匹克标志侵权法律规制的经验性成果与我国"以法护标"系列举措的对比性研究出发,总结保护奥林匹克标志在立法领域的成功经验。在此基础上提出完善立法形式,扩大保护范围,明确使用范围,采用高效救济途径等建议,来完善我国奥林匹克标志侵权立法,以期对奥林匹克标志的全面保护提供借鉴。As the spiritual symbol of human civilization,the Olympic symbols are of not being infringed and profaned.However,the most sacred spiritual achievement has been violated with the ceaseless expansion of contemporary commodity economy awareness.Different countries in the world have attached great importance to protecting the Olympic symbols by means of legislation,and have been making great efforts.This paper compared the empirical achievements of the infringement legislation of the Olympic symbols in USA,Australia and UK,and the legal measures of protecting Olympic symbols of China,sums up successful experience of protecting Olympic symbols in the domain of legislation,and puts forward suggestions concerning improvement of the infringement legislation of the Olympic symbols of China： improving legislative forms,expanding the scope of legislative protection,stipulating the scope of fair use and adopting efficient legal remedy,which was to provide a reference for the comprehensive protection of the Olympic symbols.

关 键 词：奥林匹克标志 法律规制 侵权行为 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]