中日陪审员制度比较研究  

Comparative Study of Jury System in China and Japan

作　　者：孙晶晶[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《延边大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第1期141-144,F0003,共5页Journal of Yanbian University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：中日两国几乎同一时期制定陪审员制度,但在陪审员制度适用范围、陪审员资格、陪审员选任、陪审员权限等方面存在较大差异。通过中日陪审员制度以及该制度实践的比较,可以归纳出日本陪审员制度对我国陪审员制度的启示有:促进司法民主化,提升司法公信力,预防冤假错案的出现,提高审理效率实现程序正义。Though jury system was introduced to China and Japan almost at the same period,its applicable scope,qualification and appointment of jurors as well as the limits of jurors＇ authority are quite different in the two countries.The comparison of the systems and their implementation will be significant to find out the countermeasures and perfect China＇s jury system by the followings： to progress the democratization of judiciary;to improve the credibility of judiciary;to prevent unjust cases;to enhance the efficiency and realize procedural justice.

关 键 词：中日陪审员制度 司法民主 比较研究 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学] D931.3