论罪刑之该当性  

Debate on Desert of Punishment

作　　者：刘军[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学威海分校法学院,山东威海264209

出　　处：《法学论坛》2011年第1期126-132,共7页Legal Forum

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目<罪刑该当与量刑规范化研究>(09YJA820042);山东大学自主创新基金杰出青年培养项目<被害人参与量刑的理论与实践>(2010SHJQ003)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：如何对待该当性是不同刑罚理论相互区隔的核心密码。但是,该当不仅指面向过去的惩罚,还应包括面向未来的奖赏,以期在正义的范围内更大程度地影响人的社会行为模式。罪刑之"该"即刑事责任的有无,此为启动刑罚权之前提;罪刑之"当"即刑事责任的大小,此为刑罚配置之标杆。刑罚既不是为了惩罚而惩罚,也不是为了宽容而宽容,刑罚的价值在于:一个人因其所作所为而受罚,社会上每一个人的自由度得到有效增加,社会却因之而更加安全。How to treat the matter of desert now is the crucial element to differentiate the theoryies of punishment,but desert not only means the punishment facing what had happened but also indicates the reward in the future which is expected to have more influence on the mode of conducts.The matter of desert includes bearing responsibility or not,which is the premise of punishment,and the degree of responsibility,which become the criterion of punishment.The value of penalty is that someone is accused because of his conduct,but the degree of freedom of everyone increased,and the society becomes safer.

关 键 词：该当性 该当性因素 罪刑该当 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]