正当防卫之“不法”性质探疑——以德日刑法违法性学说为视角  

On the Nature of "Illegality" about Justifiable Defense

作　　者：梁云宝[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,江苏南京211189

出　　处：《法学论坛》2011年第1期139-144,共6页Legal Forum

基　　金：2008年国家法治与法学理论研究项目<中西刑法文化和定罪制度比较研究>(SFB2024)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：正当防卫之"不法"性质,在德日存在主观违法性论与客观违法性论的对立,在我国因耦合式犯罪构成的约束,无论是作主观违法性论还是客观违法性论的理解,均存在难以克服的缺陷。在主客观相统一原则下,实现犯罪构成的阶层化,以修正的客观违法性论为基础,实现"不法"与"违法"的分离,允许对物反击时准用正当防卫,不失为摆脱困境的方法之一。In German and Japan,the nature of illegality concerning Justifiable defense exists subjective illegality and objective illegality.In China,restricted by the ＂complanate＂ constitution of crime,it has defects which are hardly to be overcome,when interpreted as subjective illegality or objective illegality.Under the principle of unified in the subjective and objective,it＇s one of ways to get out of the trouble that dimensional constitution of crime will be realized,illegality will be distinguished from breaking the law on the bases of the modified objective illegality,and the counterattack to things will be regarded as the justifiable defense.

关 键 词：正当防卫 犯罪构成 不法 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]