检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:康炜[1] 辛娜[1] 尤涛[1] 李建华[1] 郑乃青 李卓[1] 田宇[1] 白跳艳
出 处:《现代检验医学杂志》2010年第6期49-50,54,共3页Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
摘 要:目的 应用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线对ELISA法定性检测乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)的cut-off值进行确定,并将确定结果应用于低水平HBsAg阳性标本进行综合评价.方法 采用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)检测1 021例乙型肝炎HBsAg血清学标志物,对从中筛选出的195例低水平HBsAg阳性标本进行化学发光微粒子免疫分析法定量,并对两种方法的结果进行评价.结果 195例HBsAg低水平阳性标本,经化学发光微粒子免疫分析法定量阳性190例(97.4%),阴性1例(0.5%),不确定4例(2.1%).ROC曲线分析结果显示,当ELISA检测HBsAg的A值在0.11时,灵敏度和特异度的比例较为合适,特异度为97.1%,敏感度为98.6%,用0.11作cut-off值对195例低水平HBsAg阳性标本重新判读结果,与应用试剂盒本身根据公式计算的cut-off值判读结果进行比较结果差异无统计学意义.结论 ELISA实验目前广泛使用的根据公式计算cut-off值判读结果的方法是可行的,能够满足临床的基本需求.Objective To confirm the cut-off value in HBsAg test by ELISA with receive operation curve and evaluate the results of low level HBsAg by applying the new cut-off value. Methods 1 021 samples HBsAg was tested by ELISA,195 low level HBsAg positive samples were detected by mieropartlcalenzyme immunofluorescence assay (MEIA). Results Among 195 low level HBsAg positive samples,190 (97.4%) were confirmed,and only 1 sample (0. 5%) was negative and 4 samples (2.1%) were uncertain. According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve,when the cut-off value was 0.11,the specificity was 97.1% and the sensitivity was 98.6%. Confirmed the positive and negative samples with new cut-off value and compared with the result confirmed by the cut-off value calculated by the formula,there was no significance in the two methods. Conclusion The cut-off value which was widely used by kit is available in clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49