基于比较优势理论对我国田径优势项目群的研究  

Advantageous event-groups of Chinese track and field based on comparative advantage theory

作　　者：孙伏友[1] 张沛林[1] 

机构地区：[1]徐州师范大学体育学院,江苏徐州221116

出　　处：《山东体育学院学报》2010年第12期74-78,87,共6页Journal of Shandong Sport University

基　　金：江苏省研究生培养创新工程资助项目(项目编号:CX10S-022R)研究成果之一

摘　　要：以第25-29届奥运会各国田径运动项目奖牌数为依据,以比较优势理论为工具,分析奥运会田径运动强国的优势项目群动态变化。研究结果表明：（1）奥运会各田径运动强国有各自的优势项目群以及各优势项目群的比较优势程度不同。（2）与我国比较优势项目群重叠最多的国家是波兰,我国与其他国家重叠最少的项目群是竞走项目群。（3）在投掷项目群上,德国绝对优势指数一直处于下降态势,其他三国都处于波动状态。（4）中长跑项目群上埃塞俄比亚和肯尼亚拥有绝对的竞技实力,我国要在奥运会上与这两国家争金夺银,必须通过合理的选材和科学的训练。Based on the medals for track and field event from the 25th to 29th Olympic Games,the paper analyzes dynamic changes of advantageous event-groups of the track and field powers by means of comparative advantage theory.The results indicate：（1） Each track and field power has its dominant event-groups and the level of their comparative advantage is different.（2） Poland is the country which most of the advantageous events overlap with our country.Compared to other events,the least overlap in the event group is race walking.（3）As for throwing group,the German index of absolute advantage has been in decline.Meanwhile,the other three countries are in a state of volatility.（4）Ethiopia and Kenya have absolute competitive strength in middle-distance race.If China wants to compete with these two countries for gold and silver medals in the future Olympic Games,we should select the talented athletes and train them with scientific training methods.

关 键 词：比较优势理论 中国 田径 优势项目群 

分 类 号：G808.1[文化科学—体育训练]