垄断行为入罪之实体与程序问题研究  

Research on the Dual Consideration of Substance and Procedure of the Criminalization of Monopolistic Conducts

作　　者：董超[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海200042

出　　处：《福建警察学院学报》2010年第6期78-85,共8页Journal of Fujian Police College

基　　金：上海市法学会重点项目"金融危机下的反垄断司法问题研究"(2010沪法课重字第6号)

摘　　要：我国《反垄断法》对垄断行为并未规定刑事责任,这对垄断行为的防治不利,同时也不符合国际通行做法和我国的立法习惯。垄断行为由于其严重的社会危害性和刑罚的无可避免性应当入罪。根据我国实际,应在慎刑原则的指导下从严控制适用范围和刑罚力度;同时设计特定的刑事诉讼程序,以利于对垄断犯罪行为的防治和查处。There is no criminal liability system in ＂Anti-monopoly Law＂（AML） in China,which brings disadvantage to the prevention of monopolistic conduct,and does not comply with the trend of the world and the practice of China.Criminalization of monopolistic conduct has formed its theory foundation because of the serious harm to society development and inevitable criminal penalty.In accordance with the reality of China,we shall control strictly application scope and penalty severity degree under the guidance of cautious punishment,and design specific criminal substance and procedure to prevent and investigate criminal monopolistic conducts.

关 键 词：垄断犯罪 适用范围 构成要件 诉讼程序 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]