检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李梅香[1]
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学公共管理学院,湖北武汉,430073
出 处:《社会保障研究》2010年第4期65-70,共6页Social Security Studies
摘 要:财政社会保障支出是否能够以及通过何种途径增进消费拉动内需,理论界一直存在争论。本文认为,从理论上讲,财政社会保障支出可以直接增加个人和居民的收入,从而增加消费量;也可以作为一种收入再分配的手段,通过增加全社会的边际消费倾向而增加消费。本文选取10个欧元区国家1996-2005年的面板数据和我国1996-2005年的时序数据分别建模,得出的结论是:欧元区国家与我国的财政社会保障支出对消费总额的影响都是显著的,但是由于经济发展水平及社会保障制度的发展阶段不同,两者的财政社会保障支出通过平均消费倾向等中间变量而对总消费的影响是有差异的。Whether social protection expenditure from governments would facilitate the gross final consumption or not,and through which approaches,which have being debated so far.This article believes that,theoretically,social protection expenditure from governments could directly increase individual income and then the gross final consumption indirectly.Also,it could influence the Marginal Propensity to Consume through the change of their anticipation for the future,and finally,the gross final consumption increases.On the other hand,social protection expenditure from governments,as a means of income redistribution,can augment social average MPC.Empirically,this article simulates equations based on panel data for 10 countries in euro area and time series in china for 10 years,and finally concludes that social protection expenditure from governments influences the consumption insignificantly both in euro area and in china.However,some intermediate variables such as Average Propensity of consume and ratio of unemployment affect consumption differently because of the differences of the development stages in terms of economy and social security.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62