检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:段雷[1] 郝吉明[1] 谢绍东[1] 叶雪梅[1]
机构地区:[1]清华大学环境科学与工程系
出 处:《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》1999年第6期95-98,共4页Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)
基 金:国家自然科学基金
摘 要:研究了两种确定硫沉降目标负荷的方法——最小超临界负荷法和等比例降低超临界负荷法,介绍了其原理和相应的数学模型,并分析了用这两种方法确定的硫沉降目标负荷及相应的超临界负荷分布。和等比例削减SO2方案比较,采用上述两种方法,中国超临界负荷总量会明显降低,而最小超临界负荷法可以使超临界负荷的区域面积比2000年无控方案减小约12%。综合考虑技术、经济和区域公平性,建议在确定中国硫沉降目标负荷时采用这两种方法。Critical load should serve as the guideline to formulate abatement strategy for sulphur deposition according to the actual situation of China. This paper introduces two methods for calculating the target loads of sulphur deposition the critical load exceedance minimization and the exceedance reduction by fixed percentage. It also includes the principles and relevant mathematical models of these two methods. Emphasis was put on the target loads of sulphur deposition and the relevant distribution of critical load exceedance of China estimated by the above methods. In contrast to the method of abating SO 2 emission by fixed percentage, Chinese gross exceedance of critical load could be much lower calculated by the former two methods. The areas with critical load exceedance were compressed by about 12% by the method of critical load exceedance minimization when compared with the result calculated with the emission quantity of the year 2000 without special emission control. With comprehensive consideration of technology, economy and the impartiality of different regions, the above two methods should be used to determine target loads of sulphur deposition in China.
分 类 号:X517[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117