检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华西医科大学附属第二医院妇产科
出 处:《华西医科大学学报》1999年第2期208-209,213,共3页Journal of West China University of Medical Sciences
摘 要:应用腹部超声及阴道超声对68例孕妇的宫颈进行监测,比较其成功率及准确性。又应用阴道超声对113例正常妊娠不同时期宫颈进行监测了解其变化。结果:阴道超声宫颈显像成功率显著高于腹部超声(分别为100%与83.82%,P<0.005),阴道超声宫颈长度值(30.7158mm)显著短于腹部超声值(35.0526mm),(P<0.001),正常妊娠宫颈长度阴道超声值为:早孕期30.2222mm;中孕期32.2500mm;晚孕期30.0419mm;足月孕未临产者25.8575mm,显著短于早、中、晚孕期。由此表明,阴道超声监测孕期宫颈不仅显像成功率高于腹部超声,且其准确性亦优于腹部超声;正常妊娠孕37周前宫颈长度无明显变化,而足月妊娠后宫颈长度显著缩短。The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the measurement of the cervix by comparing transvaginal sonography (TVS) with transabdominal sonography (TAS) and to assess TVS measurement of the cervix in pregnancy. The cervix was measured in the first, second, third trimesters and at term by TVS in 131 normal singleton pregnancies and by TAS in normal pregnant women. The results showed that TVS was better in providing successful rate and accurate identification of uterine cervical length, compared with TAS. The cervical lengths in the first, second, third trimesters and at term were 30.22mm,32.25mm,3004mm and 25.86mm respectively. The results suggest that TVS be superior to TAS in cervical measurement and that in normal pregnancy, the cervical length does not change significantly until the time when cervical length shortening begins at term.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28