锁骨骨折三种治疗固定方法的疗效比较  

Comparison of Efficacy of Three Different Fixed Treatment Methods in Clavicle Fracture

作　　者：谢世华[1] 李霞[1] 韩春鸣[1] 彭瑞明[1] 常德海[1] 李荣[1] 

机构地区：[1]解放军第十医院创伤骨科中心,甘肃武威733000

出　　处：《临床医学工程》2011年第2期211-212,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering

摘　　要：目的比较锁骨骨折保守治疗、切开内固定及万向外固定三种固定方法的疗效。方法 60例病人共随机分为三组进行固定效果和感染情况的统计比较。结果保守治疗组失效率为40%;切开复位内固定组断板及脱针率为25%,针孔感染率为15%;外固定器组愈合良好90%,固定失效10%,针孔感染为10%。结论外固定器的治疗是一种固定效果可靠、创伤小,外部美观的固定方法,治疗效果明显优于保守治疗及切开复位内固定。Objective To compare the efficacy of three methods of conservative treatment, open reduction and internal fixation, external fixation. Methods 60 patients were randomly divided into three groups, fixed effects and infections were statistically compared. Resuits The failure rate of conservative treatment group was 40%; in open reduction and internal fixation group the rate of broken plates and off-needles was 25%, the infection rate of pinhole was 15%; in external fixation group the healing rate was 90%, the fixation failure rate was 10%, the infection rate of pinhole was 10%. Conclusion The treatment of external fixation device is a reliable method of minimally invasive, external appearance beauty, which is better than conservative treatment and open reduction and internal fixation.

关 键 词：锁骨骨折 保守治疗 切开复位内固定 万向外固定器 

分 类 号：R687.3[医药卫生—骨科学]