检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《现代医药卫生》2011年第3期344-345,共2页Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
摘 要:目的:比较颈内静脉与锁骨下静脉穿刺两种中心静脉置管术的成功率及并发症发生情况。方法:126例需行中心静脉置管的手术病人随机分成2组,颈内静脉置管组(A组,n=72),锁骨下静脉置管组(B组,n=54),对置管成功率和常见并发症进行比较。结果:颈内静脉穿刺置管术较锁骨下静脉穿刺术的成功率高,并发症少(P<0.05)。结论:临床麻醉中颈内静脉比锁骨下静脉穿刺置管安全实用。Objective:To compare the success rate and complication incidence between jugular and subclavian vein punctures in the central vein catheterization.Methods:The patients undergoing deep venous puncture and catheterization were divided into two groups:internal jugular vein group(n=72) and subclavian vein group(n=54).The success rate and complications were compared.Results:The internal jugular vein group had higher success rate and fewer complications compared with the subclavian vein group(P0.05).Conclusion:Internal jugular vein puncture is safer and more practical than subclavian vein puncture in clinical anesthesia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.232.138