日本反垄断法适用除外制度及启示  

Exemptions from Antimonopoly Law in Japan and Their Enlightenment

作　　者：王玉辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]郑州大学法学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第1期59-63,共5页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究资助项目(10YJC820115);郑州大学"211工程"重点学科建设资助项目

摘　　要：日本根据适用除外制度与反垄断法宗旨的关系不同将其划分为确定性适用除外和倒退性适用除外。确定性适用除外旨在保护中小企业参与竞争的能力以及维护知识产权领域的特定行为;确定性适用除外有利于竞争机制的维护,必将随着竞争政策的强化得以运用。倒退性适用除外则在市场经济尚未健全条件下保障了政府依靠产业政策培育相关产业、发展规模经济,但该适用除外与反垄断法维护竞争的宗旨相违背,必将随着市场机制的完善、竞争政策的强化逐渐被废止。日本适用除外制度运用的经验与教训,对我国如何通过适用除外制度协调竞争政策与产业政策的相互关系具有一定的借鉴意义。The exemptions from the antimonopoly law in Japan can be divided into two kinds, i.e. , the definite exemption and regressive exemption, according to the relationship between the anti-monopoly law and exemption. The former aims to protect SME＇s competitiveness and the certain act in intellectual properties field so as to benefit the maintenance of competitive mechanism. It shall be executed necessarily with the enhanced competition policy. The latter is to be executed under the conditions the market economy has not been developed perfectly yet for the purpose of governmental industrial policy to incubate related industries and develop economies of scale, i. e. , it goes against the aim of the antimonopoly law which keeps on the competition. So, the latter will unavoidably be abolished gradually along with the perfected market mechanism and enhanced competitive policy. The Japanese experience and lessons as above are beneficial to China to a certain extent with respect to how to coordinate the mutual relationship between competition policy and industrial policy by way of introducing the exemptions.

关 键 词：反垄断法 适用除外制度 产业政策 竞争政策 

分 类 号：D912.29[政治法律—民商法学]