检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西华师范大学四川省教育发展研究中心,四川南充637009 [2]西华师范大学政治与行政学院,四川南充637009
出 处:《煤炭高等教育》2011年第1期57-59,共3页Meitan Higher Education
摘 要:教育部组织实施的本科教学水平评估,是一次具有浓厚行政色彩的评估。其虽具备适应形势发展的合理性,但也存在着不适应我国高等教育发展规律的因素。因而,本科教学水平评估引发的思考关键在于,应当根据高等教育发展的规律来处理政府参与、扩大代表性及取消行政利益关系等;同时分析探讨了以人大及其相关专门委员会代替教育行政部门作为本科教学水平评估主体的可行性与可能性,并认为人大及其专门委员会作为本科教学水平评估的主体将更有利于我国本科教学水平评估的发展。The undergraduate teaching proficiency evaluation implement by the Education Ministry is an evaluation with a strong executive color. Although the evaluation has its rationality to adapt to the development of situation, but there are existing some factor that not suited the development law of China higher education. Thus, the key thinking caused by the undergraduate teaching proficiency evaluation lies in: we should deal with the government participation, expand the representation and the abolition of the administrative interest relation be based on the law of higher education; and if the NPC and its special committee replace the education administrative departments as the main body of undergraduate teaching proficiency evaluation will be more conducive to the development of undergraduate teaching proficiency evaluation.
分 类 号:G640[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3