辩护人、诉讼代理人毁灭、伪造证据,妨害作证罪考察  

Consideration on the Crime of Destroying or Forging Evidence or Interfering with Testimony by Defenders or Law Agents

作　　者：杨金彪[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民公安大学法律系,北京100038

出　　处：《成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第1期82-89,共8页Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences

摘　　要：现行刑法第306条——判处辩护人、诉讼代理人毁灭、伪造证据,妨害作证罪的立法根据在于,该罪行具有侵害国家司法作用的高度危险。由于辩护人、诉讼代理人在刑事诉讼中的特殊作用,决定了该罪行应当从重处罚。引诱行为的实质内容在于使证人违背事实改变证言或者作伪证,而不在于引诱的具体行为方式,即使是诱导式询问的某些特别类型也存在构成刑法第306条罪行的余地。刑法第306条与第307条是特别犯与一般犯的关系。辩护人、诉讼代理人藏匿、隐避证人的,属于本罪的毁灭证据的行为;辩护人、诉讼代理人明知是他人伪造、变造的证据而使用的,应当属于本罪的伪造证据的行为。The essential basis on which the defenders and law agents are punished in article 306 is that the state judicial action is facing at highly dangerous infringement of such behavior as destructing or forging the evidences or interfering in the testimony of such people. Because of the special role of the defenders and law agents in criminal proceedings, such actions shall be given a heavier punishment. Therefore, there are no essential reasons to abolish such a crime. The substance of the seducing behavior lies at seducing the witness to changing testimony or perjuring against facts, but not at the specific way of seducing action, so even the inducing inquiry of some special types can also constitute such a crime. The relationship between article 306 and article 307 is special crime or general one. The article 306 is the special one. The hiding or sheltering behaviors of the witness of the defenders or law agents belong to the action destructing evidences in article 306, and the employing behaviors of forged or altered evidence knowingly of such people also belong to the action of forging evidences in the same article,

关 键 词：辩护人 诉讼代理人 毁灭伪造证据 妨害作证 

分 类 号：DF639[政治法律—刑法学]