检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:仲崇玲[1]
出 处:《武警学院学报》2011年第1期35-38,共4页Journal of the Armed Police Academy
摘 要:基于对军事权潜在危险性和强大破坏力的忧虑,近代宪法力图将其安定在预设的框架之内。但军事权并非与人类的宪政文明天然相容。所以,现代宪法需要以分权理念来消解军事权的集权性、以平等理念来消解军事权的强隶属性、以正义理念来消解军事权的极端性。于是,各国的宪法文本通常需要在军事权的增强与节制、区隔与融合、明确与模糊间作出权衡。另外,理解军事权的宪法规制还应当超越宪法文本,探究那些行宪过程中能够影响甚至决定军事权的隐性规则。从而真正理解政治制度、文化传统、风俗习惯乃至人们之间以默会的方式发挥作用的信念和原则对军事权运作的重大影响。Based on military power's potential danger and undermining to democracy and liberty,modern constitutions try to control it within the limited frame.However,the military power is not easy to be integrated into the constitutional civilization for its nature,the constitution of modern states must defuse the military power's character,such as the centrality,the intense attribute property and extremeness by the idea of decentralization,equality and justice.Frequently,the modern states have to choose between strengthening and restraining,distinguishing and integrating,explicating and blurring to control military power effectively.In addition,the understanding of the constitutional control of military power also demands us beyond the constitutional text.It is the invisible rule that inflicts more influence to the operation of military power.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222