反垄断损害赔偿责任研究  

Studies on the Duties of Compensation Liability for Anti-monopoly

作　　者：张骏[1] 

机构地区：[1]华侨大学法学院,福建泉州362021

出　　处：《南通大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第1期53-58,共6页Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：华侨大学高层次人才科研启动项目(10BS308)

摘　　要：反垄断损害赔偿责任与民事损害赔偿责任有着明显的区别。两者有着截然不同的目的:两者的构成要件,比如主体、归责的意思状态、能引致损害赔偿的违法行为范围、损害的认定、损害的计算等方面差异明显;两者的实现方式,如管辖的法院、公权力的介入程度及诉讼时效等方面也有所区分。但是,我国现行的《反垄断法》第五十条对反垄断损害赔偿的规定却极为简单,并且以民法作为依据,这显然会影响到反垄断法的实施效果。因此,应当在《反垄断法》中明确规定反垄断损害赔偿责任和确定我国反垄断赔偿的合适赔偿倍率,即三倍赔偿模式。The significant differences between the duties of compensation liability for anti-monopoly and the duties of civil compensation are as follows. They have different components, for example, the subjects, liabilities, fields of damaging behaviors, the identification of damage and the calculation of damage. They also have different realization, for example, different courts, the extent of the interference of public power and prescriptions extinctive. However, the 50th provision in the existing Anti-monopoly Law states rather simply about the duties of compensation liability and is based on Civil Law, which remarkably affects the implementation efficiency of anti-monopoly law. Therefore, there are supposed to be clear-cut statements about the duties of compensation liability for anti-monopoly.

关 键 词：反垄断法 反垄断损害赔偿责任 民事损害赔偿 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]