武汉、台北、香港三城市院外急救比较研究  

Comparative study of its pre-hospital emergency exercise among Wuhan, Taibei and Hong Kong

作　　者：刘厚俭[1] 熊悦安[1] 陈欢[1] 张欣[1] 王飞[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉市急救中心,430022

出　　处：《中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志》2011年第1期7-10,共4页China Journal of Emergency Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine

摘　　要：目的通过对武汉，台北，香港这三个有着相同语言，相同文化的地区，进行院外急救相关方面的调研和比较，以便加速内地院外急救观念的转变，完善应急机制，提高突发公共事件紧急医疗救援能力。方法通过查阅文献资料、资料研究及分析对比。结果香港无论在同等服务人口投入的急救人员数量上，还是在日常当班急救车数量及日常急救任务量上都居第一，台北次之，武汉最低。按每台当班急救车抢救转送相同病例数所配备的急救人员相对数量来看，武汉需要的人员最多，不经济，人力资源消耗最大。台北，香港救护车上急救人员主要为救护员，而武汉必须有医师。结论内地所确定的院外急救改革发展方向同港台地区目前的做法是一致的，院外急救属于公共卫生服务领域，应南政府负责提供均等化服务。要加强研究。Objective Sharing with identical language and cultural background, Wuhan, Taipei, and Hong Kong were subject to be comparatively studied on the relevant aspects in prehospital emergency medical exercise. Methods Such a study serves to expedite the process in improving those emergency medical organizations＇ responding capabilities in any unexpected public events in Mainland. Results The result of study indicated that Hong Kong took first place in providing medical resource, Taipei second and Wuhan the last for same amount of population. It is considered not economical as more than adequate medical staff allocated at each ambulance unit in Wuhan＇s emergency medical system than that in either Hong Kong or Taipei where only emergency technician is required to be sent with an ambulance rather than a doctor required in Mainland. Conclusion Though the way of reform development of majority of emergency medical centers in the Mainland keeps identical with that in Hong Kong/Taipei which is considered being advanced in the industry, there is still a plenty of room to improve in area such rational allocation of emergency medical resource.

关 键 词：院外急救 比较研究 

分 类 号：R605.974[医药卫生—急诊医学]