检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨美华[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江省安吉县妇幼保健院妇产科,浙江安吉313000
出 处:《中国现代医生》2011年第2期155-156,共2页China Modern Doctor
摘 要:目的探讨Leep刀和微波治疗中重度宫颈糜烂的临床效果。方法 150例宫颈糜烂患者随机分成两组,分别采用微波治疗和Leep刀治疗。分析患者手术时间、术中出血量和治愈情况。结果 Leep刀治疗组出血量大于微波治疗组(P<0.05),治愈率高于微波治疗组(P<0.05)。两组治疗所用时间无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论相比较于微波治疗,应用Leep刀治疗中重度宫颈糜烂有更好的效果。Objective To investigate the efficacy of Leep and microwave in treating cervical erosion. Methods There were 150 patients with cervical erosion were separated into two groups randomly and equally. Patients in the control group received microwave treatment and patients in the observe group were managed With Leep treatment. The operation time, blood loss in operation, cure rate of the two groups were analyzed. Results The blood loss the cue rate of observe group were significantly higher than that of control group(P〈O.05). But the difference on operation time between was not significant(P〉O.05). Conclusion Compared with microwave, Leep hays better clinical effects in treating hysteromyoma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145