检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉大学经济与管理学院
出 处:《财经科学》2011年第3期41-48,共8页Finance & Economics
摘 要:本文以2008年中国内地126个地级以上城市为样本数据,利用四阶段DEA方法,对中国城市公共支出效率进行了实证分析。结果显示:如果不对外部环境因素加以控制,则经典的DEA方法将会高估城市公共支出效率;在控制外部环境因素影响后,样本城市公共支出效率得分为0.353,表明在保持支出不变下,通过改善组织管理、优化支出规模及结构,公共服务供给水平可提高约64%,城市公共支出效率还有很大的提升空间;经济发达、较大的辖区面积是城市公共支出效率提升的有利条件,而人口增加对公共品供给产生的拥挤效应不利于城市公共支出效率提升。In this paper,based on the 126 prefecture-level cities-sample data in the mainland of China in 2008,we using four-stage DEA method conducted an empirical analysis of the efficiency of public spending.The empirical results show:If we do not control the external environmental factors,Classical DEA will overestimate the efficiency of city public expenditure;Controlling factors in the external environment,the sample of city public expenditure efficiency score of 0.353,which shows that in keeping spending constant,by improving the organization and management,optimizing the size and structure of expenditure,the level of public service supply can be increased by about 64%.As for the efficiency of city public spending,there is still much room for improvement;Developed economy and greater area are favorable conditions for city public expenditure efficiency gains.Urban crowding effect produced by the population growth on the supply of public goods is not conducive to upgrading the efficiency of public spending.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.119.59